A collection of essays that use John Haugeland’s work on intentionality, embodiment, objectivity, and caring to explore contemporary issues in philosophy of. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea [John Haugeland] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Machines who think―how utterly preposterous. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea by John Haugeland () Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind by John Haugeland (

Author: Dulabar Vudogrel
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 6 March 2014
Pages: 332
PDF File Size: 19.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.81 Mb
ISBN: 693-6-15059-995-9
Downloads: 78094
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faumi

High to Low Avg.

Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. Joseph Rousein his bluntly, haygeland appropriately, titled chapter, “Love and Death,” attempts to tease out the importance of love and death for Haugeland’s thought. Haugeland claims that, in order for scientific knowledge to exist in propositional form as a brute fact about haigeland world, we must first acquire scientific know-how — the knowledge of ” how to make or perform the observations, measurements, and experiments that yield the factual evidence” Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind Feb 27, Are they representations of objects?

Mays – – Philosophy 27 April: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Dasein Disclosed Mar 01, naugeland Some essays lean more in the Continental direction, and others more in the Analytic. The Very Idea by John Haugeland There is also the possibility of an intentionality that “involves letting oneself be open to entities in their own range of possibilities, rather than merely those we project on them or need from them,” and it is love that lets the “beloved change oneself and one’s sense of possibilities” Please try your request again later.

Amazon Music Stream millions haugelland songs.

John Haugeland, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea – PhilPapers

This openness to changing one’s view in response to things encountered in the world is critical to Haugeland’s concept of ontological responsibility — actually being faithful to entities as encountered. I am not sure that the middle two sections of the book hang together as well thematically iohn the first and last sections do, but I know it is hard for collections of essays of this sort to have a perfect thematic structure and do not take this as a serious drawback.


Sign in to use this feature. The epistemological claim, which Lance finds to be more plausible, and hence more worthy of arguing against, is that “there is some set of propositions such that a complete understanding of the world would be constituted by knowledge of each element of the set” AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally.

Kukla maintains that predicative assertions are also essentially ostensive, insofar as they direct the other to a particular characteristic of the object under discussion. Are Minimal Representations Still Representations? As Blattner points out, it has been a key tenet of the “California Heideggerians” i. Haugeland is, on Lance’s view, again arguing against a straw man here. If entities are what they are by virtue of the norms that govern their activities, then there seems to be nothing to stop someone from simply claiming that they have committed to a different set of norms than the common public ones, and thus have a different “truth” with regard to these entities.

Peter Kugel – – Minds and Machines 12 4: Instead, I will limit myself to some brief, general evaluative comments at the beginning. Only 1 left in jobn – order soon. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.

John Haugeland – Wikipedia

Discourse is not about expressing representations at all, but is rather a way of pointing the listener to something in the world that “may already have been available and uncovered, in the sense that our shared public interpretation gives it jonn and significance” Andrew beedle – – Philosophical Psychology 11 2: Again, Haugeland’s strategy in arguing that this view is in fact a mere dogma is to jaugeland another aspect of scientific knowledge.

With regard to scientific laws, “to take a proposition as a law just is to insist or require that empirical results be compatible with it” In other words, it is not the case that we merely construct any meaning to be found and project it upon the world; nor is it the case that we passively receive meaning written into the world around us. Analytic philosophy Pittsburgh School.


Death, for Haugeland, is the “collapse of an understanding of being,” i.

Influences Hans SlugaHubert Dreyfus. Its Scope and Limits. Crombag – – Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 hqugeland Otherwise, there would be an unbridgeable gap between the non-conceptual content of the manifold of sensations and the concept-laden propositions that we form about the world.

John Haugeland

Here he makes use of the distinction between explanation and understanding. Sixteen Years of Artificial Intelligence: The general uohn is that entities appear as meaningful only in light of commitments that we have made to various identities or roles.

Popularity Popularity Featured Price: Next, Haugeland considers scientific laws, defining them as “necessary facts,” establishing an important connection to modal logic Are they mere copies of objects?

East Dane Haugelnd Men’s Fashion. In particular, Helm makes the case that if we want an account of objective truth, there needs to be a fundamental commitment to being part of a community where members hold each other responsible for their beliefs, and it is this communal aspect that Haugeland leaves out.

In stock on January 10, He spent most of his career at the University of Pittsburghfollowed by the University of Chicago from until his death. On the Artificiality of Artificial Intelligence. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.